top of page

Choosing the Right Jurisdiction for Token Issuance

Updated: Mar 17


Key coniderations in choosing the place for ICO or token issuance

The blockchain and crypto world continues to evolve rapidly, bringing innovations like token issuance to enable fundraising and bootstrapping decentralized networks. However, the regulatory landscape remains fragmented, making the choice of jurisdiction and legal structure for a token issuance extremely important.


Here are some key factors to consider when selecting where and how to issue tokens for your project:


Regulatory Landscape

  • The regulatory landscape in the jurisdiction, as it relates to crypto and token issuance activity, is crucial. Some jurisdictions like Switzerland, Singapore, and Gibraltar have clear frameworks for token issuers to operate within. Others take a more hands-off approach currently. Understanding the regulations will impact the legal and compliance requirements.

  • For security token offerings (STOs), jurisdictions like Switzerland, Lichtenstein, and Malta have regulatory environments conducive to these types of token offerings.

  • Adhering to protocols for Virtual Asset Service Providers (VASPs) may be necessary in some jurisdictions if the token activities fall under the VASP definition. The application process and timelines vary across jurisdictions.

Tax Treatment

  • Selecting a tax-neutral jurisdiction can be beneficial for efficiently raising capital through a token sale and avoiding unwanted tax implications.

  • Be aware of how token sale transactions are taxed in the jurisdiction under consideration.


Legal and Compliance Costs

  • Legal, licensing, and compliance costs differ widely depending on the jurisdiction. More regulated jurisdictions typically have higher costs related to obtaining approvals, implementing KYC/AML, etc.

  • However, a higher degree of regulatory rigour and oversight may provide more legitimacy and investor confidence in the project. Important to weigh costs against benefits.

 

Professional Services Ecosystem

  • Access to lawyers, tax advisors, and other professionals with expertise in blockchain and token issuance is key to navigating the process smoothly.

  • The availability of professional services specialising in token issuance and the broader crypto and blockchain ecosystem is paramount. This encompasses professional directors, accounting providers, tax advisors, and legal advisors adept at navigating the complex crypto terrain.

  • Access to specialised professional services for token issuance, blockchain, and crypto is crucial. This includes skilled accounting providers, legal advisors, tax experts, and other professionals who can navigate the complex crypto landscape.


Reputation and Investor Perception

  • The reputation and public image of the jurisdiction can impact perceptions of your project. Jurisdictions seen as very crypto-friendly or well-regulated tend to provide an added layer of legitimacy.

 

Entity Structure

  • Centralized vs. decentralized issuance process will dictate optimal entity structure. For centralized issuance, a dedicated legal entity like a Token SPV provides liability protection and enables compliance with legal and regulatory requirements.

  • Jurisdictions with VASP regimes generally require a registered legal entity that obtains necessary licensing.

 

Carefully weighing the above factors will enable projects to choose the best jurisdiction and entity structure for their unique token issuance needs and goals. Expert legal guidance can prove invaluable in navigating this complex landscape.

Comments


bottom of page